Investment Process
We start by defining risk as realised loss, rather than volatility. We then reflect on this against a client’s individual circumstances, their own objectives, timeframe and capacity for loss. This helps us define an investment mandate and with that, portfolio makeup.
Portfolios consist of two components, an equity and non-equity element. Equity, we believe, offers the highest volatility but with that the greatest potential return over the longer term. Non-equity are investments that carry a lower degree of volatility, but with it, usually lower rates of return than equities. Depending on a client’s personal circumstances, a portfolio mix of equity and non-equity is achieved. The longer ones timeframe and higher their capacity for loss, the greater their allocation to equities in a bid to deliver higher long term returns. Equally, the lower ones tolerance for risk and shorter timeframe to invest, the higher the allocation to non-equity, thereby reducing the risk of realised loss.
Both elements of the portfolio work in harmony, so that they are not pulling against one another, rather act as a blend to reduce overall portfolio volatility.
Traditionally clients might be pigeonholed into an investment mandates such as Growth, Balanced or Cautious, rather we prefer to adopt more of a slide rule approach, not wishing to be so defined, instead fluidly moving ones portfolio that matches both their changing circumstances and the macro environment. This continuous tuning of the portfolio ensures that it remains positioned to best meet your objectives and maximise performance as we travel through the economic cycles. The fact that our client engagement is continuous and the relationships that we forge run deeper than just the investments we manage, means the tweaking of portfolios is subtle rather than making dramatic changes at particular life events or after overdue reviews.
Investment Principles
Be a sponge for information